Post-Incident Review
A meeting to analyze what happened during an incident and identify improvements.
A meeting to analyze what happened during an incident and identify improvements.
## Learning from Failure You already paid for the incident (in downtime and stress). The **Post-Incident Review (PIR)** is where you get value for that money. ### Why PIRs Fail Most PIRs are boring forms that people fill out to satisfy compliance. "Root Cause: Bug. Action: Fixed Bug." **This is useless.** ### A Good PIR Asks: * How did we detect it? (Could we detect it faster?) * How did we respond? (Did we have the right tools?) * Why did the system allow this invalid state? * What **process** failed? (Code Review? QA? Deploy pipeline?) ### Timing Hold the PIR within **24-48 hours** while memories are fresh. Invite the responders and stakeholders.
ExThe "Human Error"
"A junior engineer accidentally deleted the production database."
Why Post-Incident Review Matters
Without review, you'll repeat the same incidents. Post-incident reviews drive learning.
Focus on process and systems, not people. Blame stops learning.